Real Customer Pattern
Quick answer: “Not traceable” is not a legal answer - it is the absence of one. Court record rooms run on registers, retention schedules and weeding records, and RTI can make the registry state on paper which of these applies to your case: does the record exist, was it weeded or transferred (with the register entry), do the registers or decrees survive even if the bundle does not, and what the reconstruction procedure is. The PIO’s reply is ordinarily due in 30 days under Section 7(1). Full route map: how to get court case records in India.
Check This First
- Gather every identifier you have: case number and year, party names, the court/bench, advocate’s name, and any old certified copy or decree in family papers - record-room searches live and die on identifiers.
- Check online first: older matters increasingly appear in digitised records - search the eCourts judgments portal and the court’s own case-status/archive search. A digitised copy may end the hunt entirely.
- File a copy application anyway (where you have enough identifiers): its formal rejection or “record not traceable” endorsement becomes the anchor your RTI quotes.
How Court Record-Keeping Actually Works
Court records are not one thing. The case bundle (pleadings, depositions, exhibits) is retained under the court’s retention schedule - and schedules differ by court and by record class. Crucially, different classes are kept for different periods, and the most important documents are often kept apart: decrees, final orders and judgment registers may be retained separately from the case bundle, depending on that court’s record-retention rules - and index registers often survive even when files do not. So “the file was weeded” does not necessarily mean everything is gone: ask about the registers and the surviving classes. Where records were genuinely lost or destroyed, some court rules or registry practice may provide a reconstruction or restoration procedure built on certified copies held by parties and surviving registers - ask for the applicable rule or procedure, if any.
What an RTI Can Ask (the record trail)
- Whether the record of case no. ________ of [year], [parties], is available in the record room, and its current location, as on record.
- If not available: whether it was weeded out, destroyed or transferred - with a copy of the relevant entry in the weeding/destruction or transfer register.
- The retention schedule applicable to the classes of records in the said case (decree, judgment, pleadings, depositions), as on record.
- Whether the decree/judgment register, index register or any surviving class of the said record is available, and the procedure and fee for certified extracts from them.
- The prescribed procedure for reconstruction of a lost or destroyed record, if any, as on record.
- The status of and endorsement on my copy application no. ________ dated ________, including any “not traceable” report recorded on it.
The Limit - Stated Plainly
RTI cannot conjure a destroyed record, and it cannot substitute the court’s copy or reconstruction procedures - where the court’s rules provide the mechanism, that mechanism is the route (CIC v. High Court of Gujarat). What RTI does is replace the shrug: a written, dated answer on whether the record exists, what happened to it, and what survives - the foundation every reconstruction, appeal or transaction needs.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Accepting a verbal “not traceable” - the written endorsement (or the RTI reply) is what has legal weight.
- Asking only for “the file” - ask class by class: decree register, judgment, index entry. The survivors are usually enough.
- Forgetting your own side’s copies - an old certified copy in family papers can anchor a reconstruction; mention it.
- Giving up at the district court - records of appealed matters may sit with the appellate court’s record room instead.
Common Questions
The court says a 30-year-old partition file was destroyed. Is my case hopeless?
Not necessarily. Depending on the court’s retention rules, decrees and judgment registers may be preserved long after bundles are weeded - and a certified extract of the decree register may be exactly what your purpose (mutation, sale, execution) actually needs. The RTI establishes what survives, on record.
What is a weeding register, and why ask for it?
When courts destroy time-expired records, the destruction is itself recorded. The entry tells you what was destroyed, when, and under what authority - and its absence for your case means the record should still exist somewhere. Either answer moves you forward.
Can RTI make the court reconstruct my file?
No - reconstruction follows the court’s own procedure, usually on an application supported by surviving copies. What RTI retrieves is the basis for it: the confirmation of loss, the surviving registers, and the procedure itself, as on record.
How FileMyRTI Helps
We choose the right route first. If your record is likely digitised or a register extract will serve, we will point you there. If the record room has gone silent, we draft the record-trail RTI with your case identifiers - the written answer that replaces verbal shrugs with a record you can act on. Apply below, or book a guided session (Rs. 499). Related: certified copy delayed and the full court-records guide.
Ready to file your RTI?
FileMyRTI's RTI drafting team prepares your application within 24 hours. Under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, the PIO is ordinarily required to respond within 30 days. If there is no proper response, we help with the First Appeal route.
Apply Now — Starting ₹399 →Want the full details of this service — what we ask, what you get, and how filing works? See the dedicated service page: RTI For Certified Copies Of Government Records Departments
Login With Google
Continue as Guest