Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry
A regulator like the RBI does not share a “fiduciary relationship” with the banks it regulates. Inspection reports, lists of wilful defaulters and penalty details can be disclosed under RTI; the regulator’s duty is transparency in the public interest.
Issue before the court
Whether the RBI could refuse to disclose bank inspection reports, defaulter lists and penalty details by claiming commercial confidence, economic interest, or a fiduciary relationship with the banks.
Facts in brief
Applicants sought RBI records — inspection reports of banks, lists of wilful loan defaulters, and penalties imposed on errant financial institutions. The RBI refused, citing a fiduciary relationship and economic-interest exemptions.
Holding / decision
The Supreme Court rejected the RBI’s stand. A regulator is not in a fiduciary relationship with the entities it regulates; the RBI’s statutory duty is to act in the interest of the public, depositors, the economy and the banking sector — not to shield banks. Such information must be disclosed, subject only to genuine, narrowly-construed exemptions and the Section 8(2) public-interest balance.
A regulator owes its duty to the public, not to the regulated; the “fiduciary relationship” and “economic interest” exemptions cannot be used to suppress regulatory information the public is entitled to know.
You can use RTI to seek regulatory information held by bodies like the RBI — inspection findings, defaulter and penalty details — and a blanket “confidentiality/fiduciary” refusal is not valid.
What RTI can help you get
- Regulatory inspection findings and action-taken information held by a regulator
- Lists of wilful defaulters and penalties, subject to genuine exemptions
- Information where the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm
What RTI may not give you
- Information genuinely exempt on a real, demonstrated economic-interest harm
- Trade secrets or commercial confidence where Section 8(1)(d) truly applies and no public interest overrides
- Disclosure that would actually endanger the economy on specific proof
When to cite this case
When a regulator refuses information citing a fiduciary relationship, commercial confidence or economic interest without a genuine, case-specific justification.
Later developments / current status
Jayantilal Mistry remains the leading authority that regulators must be transparent. The RBI faced contempt proceedings over compliance, and later cases continue to test the limits for sensitive data — but the core principle stands.
Source & verification
Related FileMyRTI services
Use RTI Dost to draft a regulator RTI, and FindMyPIO to reach the right CPIO.
Login / Sign up
Login With Google
Continue as GuestOr use your email Address
*We value your trust. Your information remains private and protected with FileMyRTI